Quantcast

Building a local economy

Ujima Project aims to put economic control in neighborhood hands

Sandra Larson | 9/13/2017, 11:20 a.m.
The Boston Ujima Project took a step forward last weekend with an inaugural assembly to launch its effort to build ...
Boston Ujima Project founding members gather for an outdoor session at the inaugural general assembly held at First Church of Roxbury on Saturday, Sept. 9. Boston Ujima Project

The Boston Ujima Project took a step forward last weekend with an inaugural assembly to launch its effort to build a new community-controlled economy in Boston’s neighborhoods of color.

Ed Whitfield, co-managing director of the Fund for Democratic Communities, delivers a keynote speech at the Boston Ujima Project’s “Dreaming Wild” launch event.

Ed Whitfield, co-managing director of the Fund for Democratic Communities, delivers a keynote speech at the Boston Ujima Project’s “Dreaming Wild” launch event.

On the Web

Boston Ujima Project: www.ujimaboston.com

Fund for Democratic Communities: https://f4dc.org

Called “Dreaming Wild,” the two-day event opened with a Friday evening reception and speaker program at the Bruce C. Bolling Building, followed by arts, social and networking events at nearby cafés, and continued with a daylong general assembly Saturday at the First Church of Roxbury, where founding members voted on the Ujima Project governance and board structure.

Nia Evans, Ujima Project’s executive director, said the opening event’s title is a riff on the phrase “I am my ancestors’ wildest dreams,” which has come into use in various justice movements.

“We think about the Ujima Project as a concrete manifestation of possibility,” she told the audience during Friday’s speaking program.

Ujima is a Swahili word and the Kwanzaa principle of “collective work and responsibility.” True to that, the project is a joining of many entities to build and sustain local wealth in Boston communities. A major piece will be its community capital fund, into which community stakeholders of many types will pool money. The Ujima Project’s members, through a democratic one-person-one-vote process, will share the task of allocating the accumulated funds to support local businesses, artists and organizations.

Launching formally now, the Ujima Project last year conducted a pilot project to test the process of raising and allocating community capital. At an August 2016 “Solidarity Summit,” $10,000 was raised from 175 small lenders and investors and doubled with matching funds from larger funders. The $20,000 was then allocated through a participant vote to five local black-owned and immigrant-owned businesses, each of which received zero-interest loans of $3,000 to $5,000.

The businesses selected for loan support at the pilot summit were Bowdoin Bike School, Fidalgo Wholesale, Fresh Food Generation, Sydney Janey Design and Norma’s Catering — locally-owned enterprises that were judged to be both good business prospects and contributors to the well-being of their communities.

The Ujima Project now is setting its sights higher. Starting this fall, the goal is to raise $2.5 million to $5 million over the next two years, and starting to allocate funds in early 2018. In future rounds, the capital fund goal could rise to $20 million. The loans will not typically be interest-free in the future, but rates will be capped.

Individual membership is open to all, though only Boston residents will have voting rights. The standard membership fee is $25, with discounts for various groups, such as youth age 14–24. Investment beyond the membership fee is encouraged, but not required.

The Ujima Project emerged from a year-long cross-sector study group hosted by the Center for Economic Democracy, Boston Impact Initiative and City Life/Vida Urbana, seeking more sustainable ways to fund grassroots organizations. After examining the feasibility of starting a public bank and looking at existing community-focused models such as participatory budgeting initiatives, cooperatively-run businesses and land trusts, the group concluded that while each of these models was good, none by itself was enough.